MARGARET BRENNAN We go now to Popular Senator Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania. Good morning, Senator, I know you're one of the lawgivers looking into this near miss in terms of the attempt on the life of Donald Trump lately, and the incident back in July. Did you get the answers you demanded from Secret Service this once week?
And yes, I am one of 13 members, seven Rs, six Ds, that are looking into this particular event on July, but also the most recent bone as well. Yes, we've been getting the answers that we have been asking for. We've been asking for quite a lot out of both the Secret Service as well as original law enforcement. And I believe that the answers have been largely forthcoming.However, the good thing about this particular group is that we've process authority to be suitable to make sure that we get the answers, If for whatever reason they are not. It's really important that this group works bipartisan- ly and snappily to be suitable to understand what happed, to be suitable to make sure that it does not be again, and to your discussion with Senator Rubio, to make sure that we restore the faith and trust in the- with the American people in the institutions similar as law enforcement and the Congress.
MARGARET BRENNAN Well, Senator, I know the Secret Service on Friday intimately admitted some of the failures on their own part. It was a five- runner summary, but the Secret Service said agents failed to use technology to descry the bushwhacker back in July as he flew a drone over the rally. Trump's detail had no idea police were looking for a suspicious person until shots were fired, and they noway directed original police to cover a near rooftop. Do you trust the current leadership to address veritably serious issues like this?
HOULAHAN These are veritably, veritably serious issues, and they've come up in our exchanges and in the briefings that we have entered, and there were some enormous gaps that .In terms of people not indeed knowing that there were two command centers, there were huge gaps. And there were also some gaps, honestly, in kind of culture and people being fairly lax in the way that they communicated with one another, and all of these effects have to be fixed. I do believe that the attention of the association is completely on all of the different effects that they can and should be doing to be correct- to correct themselves. I suppose also the attention of the Congress is on them as well to make sure they've the coffers to be suitable to make those corrections too.
MARGARET BRENNAN And I want to talk to you further about some of those results on the other side of this marketable break, if you could stay with us, Senator, so we could finish our discussion. And we'll be right back with further from Senator Houlahan. Stay with us.
MARGARET BRENNAN Drink back to" Face The Nation." We're continuing our discussion with Pennsylvania Senator Chrissy Houlahan. Senator, just to button up this discussion about the Secret Service and political violence right now, our rearmost CBS bean shows Harris sympathizers suppose the nation will see a advanced trouble of violence if Donald Trump is tagged, and Trump backers suppose the nation will see advanced pitfalls if Vice President Kamala Harris is tagged. Do you have any concern about rhetoric? And with Egalitarians characterizing Donald Trump as a trouble to republic, do you suppose that can be used to justify or inadvertently indeed encourage violence?
HOULAHAN Sure, and let's start from the morning. Political violence of any form is inferior and we wo n't tolerate it. And the Democratic Party, starting from the veritably top, from President Biden to Vice President Harris to members of Congress similar as myself, have reprobated political violence full stop. And it's one of those effects where we really do need to telephone down the temperature and the vitriol and I suppose that it's important that everybody do that. And as you mentioned in your earlier member, it starts at the top. Leadership matters, and so both sides of the aisle need to make sure that we are being thoughtful about these exchanges that we are having. But important to you about me to know is, you and I would probably not be talking had there not been the first election of President Trump. And numerous of the ways that he conducts himself, really need to make sure that that we understand that should he return to the White House, I'm tête-à -tête concerned that that would be a problem for our republic. But that means that I am working hard to make sure that I get out the vote and have the exchanges to make sure that Kamala Harris is successful in her sweats to go to the White House.
MARGARET BRENNAN And you said that in this bipartisan disquisition that's a focus for you, to make sure that you have Republicans and Egalitarians delivering the same communication. And I take your point there.
HOULAHAN Absolutely and- exactly. We were chosen because we are serious lawgivers. We were chosen because we tend to be those people who are willing to do the work and to do it still and effectively, and to do it bipartisan- ly, and that is what I intend to do.
MARGARET BRENNAN You are, as we said, a representative from Pennsylvania and the Commonwealth is a crucial battlefield. Our CBS polling shows it's just dead heat there. But history, Senator JD Vance was campaigning in Pennsylvania, and he said they feel extremely good about their prospects there. Do you have that kind of confidence?
REP. HOULAHAN I've the contrary feeling, which is, as I mentioned, I would not be talking to you had Hillary Clinton been successful times agone. And we had confidence as Egalitarians that evening that Pennsylvania would be blue, and as we all know, that was not the case. So I'll let Mr. Vance have his confidence, because I am going to keep working all the way into the end of the election and through the finish line and through the tape recording, because I really believe it's that important that we take nothing for granted and that we work as hard as we can during this coming several weeks I guess. Six weeks now. MARGARET BRENNAN Six weeks.
And you know, on that debate stage, I heard Vice President Harris veritably specifically speak to the 500,000 Polish Americans she said, live in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and she drew that directly to her position on Ukraine and the war there. I know you're leading outreach to Polish Americans. How do you quantify how that war, 1000s of long hauls down from the United States, impacts how choosers in the state of Pennsylvania actually suppose about it? Do you really suppose that it has an influence on the vote?
REP. HOULAHAN I do, and I can draw a straight line to it. My father was born in Poland. He was born in 1942 into a Jewish family. He and his mama survived the Holocaust. I am then, I am then in America because he was suitable to survive and came then and had a thriving nonmilitary career, and now I am a member of Congress one generation latterly. That's because of the constant war that goes over that part of our of our world, starting back in the Huns. And I suppose it's really important that we talk to the Polish- American population, as well as everybody from the kind of Eastern Europe area, because it's not that long ago that World War Two was and that's absolutely commodity that can repeat itself if we do not support the Ukrainians, and we do not support their fight for their republic, which is their fight for all of our republic. Also, importantly as a Pennsylvanian, the Lithuanian National Guard is our mate country, and so our men and women are in Lithuania at this moment, within detriment's way, if we do not help Ukraine. So I do suppose it's absolutely an issue that makes sense and that we should talk about in places like Pennsylvania.
0 Comments